When you get your official 2010 Census form you will notice that a significant section is devoted to determining your racial identity. On that question number 9, you can do something legal and that will also send a message to the race-obsessed in our government; Check that last box and fill in “American”. And, not one of those hyphenated Americans either. Michelle Malkin notes that Theodore Roosevelt didn’t think much of that type of moniker and quotes this passage from True Americanism:

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all… The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic… There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else.

Remember — for your race, write in AMERICAN!

Yesterday I was totally blown away while watching Glenn Beck’s CPAC keynote speech. Intending to have Fox News on the tube for background noise as I cleaned the fridge and put away the marketing purchases, I simply had to stop, sit and watch this nearly 1 hour tour de force. Leaving very few, if any, stones unturned while castigating both Democrats and Republicans alike for their profligate-spending and ignorance, or pure indifference to our Constitution, Beck delivered the goods.

I like Beck, am thoroughly entertained by his antics on his show and am loving his book. However, I had no idea that he could deliver such a powerful alter-call for coming back to true Conservatism. Anthony Del Pellegrino over at the Politics section of Gather.com puts it this way:

Beck’s almost hour long keynote address was both eloquent and hard-hitting. It was packed with intelligent humor, powerful prose as well as inspirational poetry. From beginning to end, the speech was brutally honest and profoundly accurate.
{…}
Beck touched just about every fundamental aspect of life in America that we have twisted and turned into a politically correct, dysfunctional society that attempts to put a cap on success and deem competition a sin. He drew a clear picture of a nation that is being steered by a government of nearsighted drivers who are more concerned with the sights and sounds along the side of the road than they are with what is right in front of them.

Spend an hour with Glenn Beck — it just might be the most important hour you experience this year.

I don’t expect to actually read the legislative language, because reading the legislative language is among the more confusing things I’ve ever read in my life. . . . When you get into the legislative language, Sen. Conrad actually read some of it, several pages of it, the other day, and I don’t think anybody had a clue, including people who had served on this committee for decades, what he was talking about.

My goodness. We’re doomed . . .

Elections have consequences! Next year we get a change to clean up this mess. Grab a broom and a mop — and better get the bleach ’cause mere soap ain’t a gonna cut it!

More legalistic-type insights over at Patterico’s.

Technorati Tags: legislative language, Sen. Conrad

This comment on my post Obama & Hugo Sittin’ In A Tree . . . Can I Puke Yet? from Glenn Speck, an environmental chemist living in Mustang, OK is plenty worthy of being an ‘Okie’ stand-alone post.

The transition of America to a third world nation continues with Obama and his ongoing unilateral surrender to every petty dictator in the world. I’m certain they are being begged to not harm us as long as we continue or restart the tribute payments to them. Hey, petty dictators need a retirement plan too, although most are “retired” by their immediate successors.

America is becoming a paper tiger and the laughing stock of the world. I’m sure that some of Obama’s Muslim brothers will eventually give all of the Obama lovers a bitter dose of reality with another terrorist attack.

Speaking of terrorist attacks, Yesterday was the 14th anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing. I would have never have believed this in 1995 as I was working relief at the bombing site downtown: I am now considered a dangerous right-wing radical by virtue of being a God fearing military veteran, gun owner who doesn’t believe in gay marriage or abortion, and so labeled by the very nation I defended and would defend again.

These are sad times for true Americans.

You sure got that right, Glenn!

The last Clark S. Judge column is now posted at Hugh Hewitt’s blog and in it he’s asking the questions that I have been struggling with in how to think about the ongoing failures of the GOP in the last two election cycles.

• Why has our team repeatedly fumbled the ball on tax and spending cuts? Those failures cost the party the presidency in 1992 and the Congress in 2006. What’s going on here?
• Why have we been so late to identify emerging issues like energy and the environment and late to ask what besides a government check and a new or bigger agency will address them?
• In such areas as health care, housing and Social Security, decades of demographic, technological and economic changes are overwhelming and unraveling programs introduced in the 1930s and 40s. Why have we failed to sell the American people on any of our fixes to these failures of government?
• Walt Whitman heard American singing, but do we? Have we lost touch with the American narrative, with the nuances of the nation’s culture, with the fabric of its life?
• These are questions. They do not imply answers. But in campaign-consultant speak, the GOP has underperformed at the polls for sometime now. Why?

If you wander around the right side of the Blogosphere there is much post-election analysis and recrimination, especially toward John McCain for being not nearly conservative enough. Well folks, he sure wasn’t, but somehow he won the primaries necessary to become our candidate. We could have had Mitt Romney at the top of the ticket, but as John & Lowell have been documenting for the better part of two years at Article 6 Blog, the evangelicals in our midst just couldn’t help but deep six his campaign over his religion, LDS. So, once again we cut off our nose to spite our face, or trip over our lil’ Richard’s as the case may be.

One ray of sunlight shining on that particular SNAFU is the coalition of religious groups that worked so hard to get CA Prop 8 (CA constitutional amendment for reestablishment of traditional meaning of marriage) on the ballot and passed by a majority of voters. Catholics, evangelicals and yes, Mormons all played a big part in this success. Now, all are needing to pull together even closer to help each other stand up to the ever increasing onslaught of anti-Prop 8 agitators, who having lost at the ballot box are taking to the streets with noise, confusion and now even violence.

All caught on tape, the video shows one protester grabbing the styrofoam cross from Burgess’ hands. Another protesters is shown stomping on it. Burgess says she was struck on the head and spit on.

“The crowd was very angry that someone was here that they felt didn’t belong here,” Burgess said. “But I’ve lived in this city for 30 years.”

“I don’t want to keep it peaceful anymore,” one protester yelled. “We should fight! We should fight!” he shouted.

During a live interview with KPSP Local 2, protesters encircled Burgess. Yelling expletives and hateful slurs, the crowd turned their anger on our news crew. Many were angry that the woman was given a chance to express her opinions.

Your obedient Okie created a simple video for ProtectMarriage.com that runs on YouTube, and my YT profile has been continuously assaulted by the most vicious and profane comments that one could imagine. I simply delete them, and comments are disabled to keep the video page religion and children friendly — no need to expose the innocent to what orifice they can have stuffed with what object, or to learn all the common gutter names for anything/everything sexual. Before these LGBT whack-jobs decide to “fight”, they had better consider that there are a lot more of us than there are of them — and I’ll guarantee that we’re better armed. At A6B John comments on the protests and their actions against religion in general.

As I have argued I, as an Evangelical, have a moral obligation to come to the aid of the Mormons in the face of this sort of onslaught, but as the protests spread, I have a practical one as well. Simply put, we’re next. Mormons are the battlefront in what is all our battle. The opposition has used the force of the courts and the people of California have said “NO” – now they seek through intimidation and violence to do what they could not achieve legally. They wish to dictate our religious expression and practice to us – first the LDS and then the rest of us. We are not just defending the LDS here, we are defending ourselves.

But I digress a bit. I keep going to that Clark Judge list above; We conservatives must hone our message, it must be relevant to the times and to the young people of America. We must embrace the technologies of communication and build our own MoveOn.org’s and DailyKos’s — and we must think into the future so that we can leverage the technologies of 2012, and 2016 and beyond.

The other side will — if we don’t, we’re as dead as the dodo . . .

He’s been saying this out on the stump for a long time. Guess he means it. Wonder if he’ll issue all of them some “brown shirts”?

Yavol mein commandant!

CHANGE? Oh ya betcha!

Fred Thompson does not mince words — He’s not at all impressed with the vacationing Barack Obama’s reponse to the Russian invasion of sovereign, democratic Georgia:

While this [Russia/Georgia] crisis plays out we should also note that these events give evidence of a larger reality: the next American President is going to face an international landscape that is more difficult and treacherous than we have ever faced. By now most Americans appreciate the dangers of international terrorism and the fact that a small number of people can wreck unimaginable havoc upon our country and our people if they get their hands on the right kinds of weaponry. What is less understood is that some of the older, traditional kinds of threats are still very much with us, only heightened because of the increasing availability of nuclear weapons and other weapon technologies.

{…}

This is no time to elect a president whose international experience is limited to speaking to adoring European crowds who want to see the United States retreat from the world … until they require our help in the next crisis that threatens them.

It has been instructive for the country to see the candidates’ reaction to the equivalent of Hillary Clinton’s 3 a.m. phone call. While he was vacationing in Hawaii, Barack Obama’s advisors scrambled into action and initially came up with the expected liberal bromides which equated the actions of Russia and Georgia and only ratcheted up the rhetoric when they began to actually understand what was happening.

It wasn’t that difficult for John McCain. For him Georgia was another little-known part of the world, whose leaders and history he is familiar with. And long before this Georgian crisis, he’s had the correct read on Russia, just as he’s had the right read on what we needed to do in Iraq.

This crisis half a world away confirms what I’ve been saying for a while: This election cycle, the traffic in the world is very heavy …and dangerous; it’s no time to give a kid with barely a learner’s permit the keys to the car.

Go and read it all. Now, who do you really want answering thost 3:00 am calls?

Technorati Tags: Fred Thompson, Barack Obama, Russian invasion, Georgia

Watch as Senator Mitch McConnell, (R) Kentucky, proposes that allowance for off-shore drilling be triggered at $4.50, $5, $7.50 and finally at $10 per gallon price of gasoline — and the Democrats objections overriding his requests.

Hey America, even if you have to fork over 10 George Washingtons (nope, doesn’t look like Obama by the way) for a gallon of go juice for the family jalopy, those “I’m trying to save the planet; I’m trying to save the planet” congressional Dem-wits don’t want to give you any relief. But, is their stance even a little bit sound, even on an environmental level? Nope, Nada, Ain’t NO way Jose! — Charles Krauthammer elaborates:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi opposes lifting the moratorium on drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and on the Outer Continental Shelf. She won’t even allow it to come to a vote. With $4 gas having massively shifted public opinion in favor of domestic production, she wants to protect her Democratic members from having to cast an anti-drilling election-year vote. Moreover, given the public mood, she might even lose. This cannot be permitted. Why? Because as she explained to Politico: “I’m trying to save the planet; I’m trying to save the planet.”

A lovely sentiment. But has Pelosi actually thought through the moratorium’s actual effects on the planet?

Consider: 25 years ago, nearly 60 percent of U.S. petroleum was produced domestically. Today it’s 25 percent. From its peak in 1970, U.S. production has declined a staggering 47 percent. The world consumes 86 million barrels a day; the United States, roughly 20 million. We need the stuff to run our cars and planes and economy. Where does it come from?

Places like Nigeria where chronic corruption, environmental neglect and resulting unrest and instability lead to pipeline explosions, oil spills, and illegal siphoning by the poverty-stricken population — which leads to more spills and explosions. Just this week, two Royal Dutch Shell pipelines had to be shut down because bombings by local militants were causing leaks into the ground.

Compare the Niger Delta to the Gulf of Mexico, where deep-sea U.S. oil rigs withstood Hurricanes Katrina and Rita without a single undersea well suffering a significant spill.

The United States has the highest technology to ensure the safest drilling. Today, directional drilling — essentially drilling down, then sideways — allows access to oil that in 1970 would have required a surface footprint more than three times as large. Additionally, the U.S. has one of the most extensive and least corrupt regulatory systems on the planet.

Does Pelosi imagine that with so much of America declared off-limits, the planet is less injured as drilling shifts to Kazakhstan and Venezuela and Equatorial Guinea? That Russia will be more environmentally scrupulous than we in drilling in its Arctic?

The net environmental effect of Pelosi’s no-drilling willfulness is negative. Outsourcing U.S. oil production does nothing to lessen worldwide environmental despoliation. It simply exports it to more corrupt, less efficient, more unstable parts of the world — thereby increasing net planetary damage.

{…}

They [the Dem-wit Democrats] seem blissfully unaware that the argument for their drill-there-not-here policy collapses on its own environmental terms. [Emph. mine]

[h/t: Michelle Malkin]The Democrats are sure good at NIMBY. Remember RFK and his uncle Teddy Kennedy and the fight to keep wind turbines out of their precious beach-front sight lines, even though you couldn’t even see ‘em from his compound? Yeah, let’s save good ol’ Gaia, at least that part o’ her that we can see from the windows at Tiffany’s. Oh ya betcha! That’s some hard-core environmental hair-growin’ and planet-savin’ going on — sho’ ‘nuf. But, forget these schmoes — Hugh Hewitt has a plan:

Shut down the government by blocking the appropriation’s bill, which will no undoubtedly contain a continuation of the off-shore drilling ban and let the public know how those Dem-wits really feel!

John Hawkins correctly notes that the ban on offshore drilling on the outer continental shelf expires at the end of the fiscal year. If the GOP refuses to allow an appropriations bill with the ban through the Congress, the ban will expire even as the government shuts down.
{…}
Obama opposes outer continental shelf drilling. Pelosi opposes outer continental shelf drilling. Reid opposes outer continental shelf drilling.

But majorities in both houses of Congress and John McCain support outer continental shelf drilling, as do large majorities of Americans.

After the war and judges, energy is the most important issue in the fall, and the GOP should keep a clear focus on the Democrats indifference to the pain at the pump spreading throughout the country.
{…}
But if the plans are laid now and explanations given over and over again of why a showdown and a shutdown are coming –because we have to bring new domestic supllies of oit to market– the GOP can win this confrontation and get the drilling ban lifted.

In the meantime, the Department of the Interior should prepare to start issuing leases for the newly opened areas the moment the ban is off. Secretary Kempthorne hemmed and hawed when I asked him about this, but President Bush and his team should direct DOI to be ready to go.[Emph. mine]

As Michell Malkin notes, even Californians (yeah, us nut jobs out here on the Left Coast!) are beginning to see the big picture.

See what happens when you lead?

It took the Beltway GOP long enough to get in front of the issue, but now it’s paying off.

No need for “rebranding” or “re-imaging” or moving to the left. Just moving ahead in the Right direction.

Still, as gasoline and heating oil prices continue to hover at $4 per gallon or rise further, and with food prices skyrocketing from increasing transportation costs, let all the up-for-a-vote Representatives and Senators that are against drilling have to face the music back home.

“Gee, we sure are sorry that lil’ Jimmy and lil’ Suzie aren’t gettin’ three squares a day because you have to pay for fuel to drive to work, or that their lil’ fingers and toes have turned that funky blue-black color — you ever heard of turning up the heat? — oh, sorry ’bout those heating oil and natural gas prices, but hey you know, we gotta concentrate on what’s really important here!”

[We're] trying to save the planet; [T]rying to save the planet.”

Yeah — right! Gaia don’t vote! Tell that to someone who cares . . .

Technorati Tags: Senator Mitch McConnell, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, anti-drilling, off-shore drilling ban, outer continental shelf drilling

Hey lefties — don’t break into my house!

From Breitbart:

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Americans have a right to own guns for self-defense in their homes, the justices’ first major pronouncement on gun rights in U.S. history.

The court’s 5-4 ruling struck down the District of Columbia’s 32-year-old ban on handguns as incompatible with gun rights under the Second Amendment. The decision went further than even the Bush administration wanted, but probably leaves most firearms restrictions intact.

The court had not conclusively interpreted the Second Amendment since its ratification in 1791. The amendment reads: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

The basic issue for the justices was whether the amendment protects an individual’s right to own guns no matter what, or whether that right is somehow tied to service in a state militia.

Writing for the majority, Justice Antonin Scalia said that an individual right to bear arms is supported by “the historical narrative” both before and after the Second Amendment was adopted.

The Constitution does not permit “the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home,” Scalia said. The court also struck down Washington’s requirement that firearms be equipped with trigger locks or kept disassembled, but left intact the licensing of guns.

Wow! I wasn’t expecting that . . . of course, the dissenting 4 justices give you a strong bitter taste of what’s to come if Obama is elected and selects the next several justices for our highest courts.

In a dissent he summarized from the bench, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority “would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons.”

He said such evidence “is nowhere to be found.”

{…}

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote a separate dissent in which he said, “In my view, there simply is no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas.”

You get that last one? “[No right] to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas.” I guess only the murderous thugs and hardened gang members get to play with the boom sticks huh? These liberal justices live in a La La Land in their own minds — dreaming about that always close Utopia where “We all just get along.” Reality is such a bummer . . .

For the S.C.O.T.U.S. alone, it’s imperative that John McCain become our next president!

Technorati Tags: Supreme Court, Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice John Paul Stevens, Justice Stephen Breyer, Second Amendment

As usual, the Anchoress hits the proverbial nail on its head and drives the sucker home with a single blow! This time its her reaction to the growing sentiment in some legal circles that we here in the United States might need to reevaluate our First Amendment rights to Free Speech and become more like Europe, or Canada — where much of admittedly disgusting and hurtful expression of ideas has become civilly liable, or even criminal, much to their detriment IMHO.

Free speech is part of what makes America great, and singular. It is what leaves America unbent when the rest of the world is cowering. Americans will die for freedom – for the freedom to say what they like, be who they are and to bend the knee only if they choose to do so, and then (usually) before no one but the Creator.

And they’ll die helping to bring that sort of freedom to others.

You don’t surrender your right to speak freely in some misbegotten effort to legislate “niceness.” To do that is to admit you are too frightened to be free.

A lot of disturbing trends in our country (I’m especially thinking of the rise of the Obamessiah!) are the result of too many of our country’s men and women grown boys and grown girls being “too frightened to be free”. What a shameful outcome from those that followed the Greatest Generation, who proved many times over that they were more than brave enough to fight, and die, for freedom. Guess we’re too busy watchin’ Oprah or somethin’ in HD to care, too concerned that we might chip a nail. Pity — pathetic! Yep lady, you’re right.

Wusses.

Technorati Tags: First Amendment, Free Speech