More On The Obama/Interpol Sovereignty SANFU
Thursday, December 31st, 2009
If like me you think this pre-Christmas move by Obama is totally FUBAR, then you’ll want to go over and read what Mark Tapscott has written today at the Washington Examiner:
Some distressing civil liberties questions must be asked about an ever-lengthening list of decisions, proposals, and observations by President Obama.
To begin, Obama is the first president to give an international law enforcement organization like Interpol free rein within the territorial confines of this nation, presumably not excluding the arrest and exportation of Americans to be charged with crimes under international law.
Put simply, this means the Constitution is no longer the supreme law of the land in America. Thanks to Executive Order 12425 , which Obama signed Dec. 16 without explaining why, the supreme law of the land is now arguably whatever Interpol says it is, most likely as directed by the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands, in conjunction with the United Nations.
{…}
So tell us, Mr. President, why do you think Interpol should operate with no accountability and no transparency in our country? Is this what you had in mind in your 2008 presidential campaign when you said “we’ve got to have a civilian national security force that is just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the U.S. military?
Pentagon generals and admirals answer to the president and Congress. Under Obama, Interpol answers to no American.
In his update, Mark tells us that when asked by the NYT about this executive order White House spokesperson Christina Reynolds replied, “there is nothing newsworthy here.” The White House is still not answering any inquiries on this.
Yesterday Mark’s opinion piece outlined what is most disturbing about this executive order 12425:
There are multiple reasons why this Obama decision is so deeply disturbing. First, the Obama order reverses a 1983 Reagan administration decision in order to grant Interpol, the International Criminal Police Organization, two key privileges. First, Obama has granted Interpol the ability to operate within the territorial limits of the United States without being subject to the same constitutional restraints that apply to all domestic law enforcement agencies such as the FBI. Second, Obama has exempted Interpol’s domestic facilities — including its office within the U.S. Department of Justice — from search and seizure by U.S. authorities and from disclosure of archived documents in response to Freedom of Information Act requests filed by U.S. citizens. Think very carefully about what you just read: Obama has given an international law enforcement organization that is accountable to no other national authority the ability to operate as it pleases within our own borders, and he has freed it from the most basic measure of official transparency and accountability, the FOIA.
2010 is shaping up to be the most important election in my lifetime. If the Democrats keep control of both houses of Congress through 2012 there might not be enough of the republic left to matter anymore.
You’re not being asked to go out in the streets and die for your freedom like the Iranian protesters are doing today, just to go out and campaign vigorously for what’s right and then vote responsibly, and to encourage your family and friends to do the same.
If you don’t, then that first option may no longer be just an option . . .
Sphere It






