Global Warming? Sheesh, That Was So Like The Nineties Don’tcha Know.
[H/t: Laer @ Cheat-Seeking Missiles]

Click to see full-size chart.Just this last August an event occurred that hadn’t in the last 95 years — there was no sunspot activity during the entire month span of time — none, Nada, ZERO. So what, Okie — like, should I care? Only if you understand the apparent relationship between sun activity and our planet’s climate. Lorne Gunter writing in Canada’s National Post puts it together for us:
In early September, I began noticing a string of news stories about scientists rejecting the orthodoxy on global warming. Actually, it was more like a string of guest columns and long letters to the editor since it is hard for skeptical scientists to get published in the cabal of climate journals now controlled by the Great Sanhedrin of the environmental movement.
Still, the number of climate change skeptics is growing rapidly. Because a funny thing is happening to global temperatures — they’re going down, not up.
Get that? A real, measurable downward trend in global temperatures is happening but the scientific community that has so heavily invested in the concept of man-caused global warming isn’t allowing any dissent heresy to be presented in its august journals. Gunter goes on to show that cooling trend being manifested this year in Brazil, and examines its causes. He then presents Craig Loehle‘s computer modeling work that shows the reality of what is called the Medieval Warm Period, a time about 1,000 years ago when the planet’s temperatures were warmer than they are now. Also, as the chart above shows, since 2000 we have been getting cooler.
Don Easterbrook, a geologist at Western Washington University, says, “It’s practically a slam dunk that we are in for about 30 years of global cooling,” as the sun enters a particularly inactive phase. His examination of warming and cooling trends over the past four centuries shows an “almost exact correlation” between climate fluctuations and solar energy received on Earth, while showing almost “no correlation at all with CO2.”
So, why are more and more global warming doubters surfacing lately? Gunter has an explanation for that, too so I’ll give him the last word.
It may be that more global warming doubters are surfacing because there just isn’t any global warming.
Technorati Tags: Lorne Gunter, Craig Loehle, Don Easterbrook, global warming
Sphere ItThis entry was posted on Tuesday, October 21st, 2008 at 9:47 am and is filed under Global Warming B.S.. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed. |
Print This Post
|
Email This Post
Recently Posted:
- Two More Pro-Global-Warming Scientists Become Sceptics — Is Hell Freezing Over Yet?
- Merry Christmas Y’All — 2011!
- Pearl Harbor Day — the USS Oklahoma — a Post Redux “x” Five
- More Climategate 2.0 Shenanigans . . . What Else Would We Expect?
- Concrete, Sustainability & The EPA — A Nasty, Expensive Mix — Oh, Ya Betcha!
- Climategate 2.0 Emails – Real & Spectacular?
- Chemtrail Of The Day
- Giving Thanks to Our Veterans On This Special Day
- Victor Davis Hanson On The Upcoming Presidential Election
- SEIU Siphons ‘Dues’ From Michigan Medicaid Payments





