18 Senators Vote to Filibuster Owen
Posted By: 'Okie' | 4:25 pm — 5/24/2005 | 
1 Comment See comments below:
What else would you expect. Capt. Ed list the 17 Democrats that voted to not allow an up-or-down vote for justice Priscilla Owen. There were enough votes to force cloture, and her vote before the full Senate is assured, but come on, these Dems are down, dirty and determined. Look at what Senator Reid said today about the compromise:
“The agreement that will allow Justice Owen to receive an up-or-down vote also had the effect of taking the nuclear option off the table,” he said, referring to Frist’s threat to strip Democrats of their ability to filibuster. “This agreement makes clear that the Senate rules have not changed. The filibuster remains available to the Senate minority.”
The lunatic fringe, as represented by the DNC chair Howard Dean, isn’t sure if the “deal” will be good for the donkey party or not.
Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean, in an interview with The Associated Press, said, “I would be hesitant to say it’s a win for the Democratic Party.” That won’t become clear, he added, until “we find out if the president consults with the Democrats” on future judicial nominees.
Dean said the deal “was a huge loss for the right wing. … It was clearly a loss for the president because he was getting accustomed to ramming things through the House and the Senate without any confrontation. It was a win for America because minority rights were supported.”
Without confrontation? Ten judges filibustered is not being confrontational? Insane. And if Howard thinks that George Bush is going to go hat in hand to Congress to pre-evaluate his judicial nominations to the Appellate and Supreme courts, he’s been drinking way to much of whatever was left on the party bus after Terry McAuliffe left.
Michelle Malkin has quite a wrap-up of links, and Confirm Them discusses majority leader Frist’s statement that the “deal” will make judicial nominee filibusters almost impossible, and makes clear that Senate Republicans still have the “out option” if a filibuster is used for anything but “extraordinary circumstances”.
Obviously, what this all means is that absolutely NOTHING HAS BEEN RESOLVED! The Dems will filibuster when they wish, although they will probably hold this card in reserve for the first Supreme Court nominee. I hope that Bush rams the two nominees, Myers and Saad, plus Brett M. Kavanaugh and William J. Haynes down their throats in short order and forces the Dems to show their hand earlier than that. (db)
This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 24th, 2005 at 4:25 pm and is filed under Focus On Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed. |
Print This Post
| 
Email This Post
Recently Posted:
- Obamessiah Wants To Heal You With Obamacare — Are You Feelin’ Any Better Yet?
- Stars & Stripes NOT Flying At Main U.S. Relief Site In Haiti!
- Obamacare — The Last Big Push — Better Stock Up On The KY . . . You’re A Gonna Need It!
- Is Obamacare A Suicide Pact? Dems Are Gonna Find Out The Hard Way!
- Obamacare Vote Coming This Week — Dems To America — Sit Down! Shut Up! Take It Already!
- Salt To Be Banned In New York Restaurants?
- “Stop Obamacare” Babies — Heh!
- The Census & Your Race — Are You An ‘American”?
- Obama Comin’ After Your Rod, Reel & Bass Boat? — Hmmm . . . Maybe!
- “Only Glenn Beck Understands Me . . . There’s A Communist Living In The White House!”
24 May 2005 | Ledger Said:
What are the real implications?
I am confused. The DU is snickering about hoodwinking the Republicans. But, when you read what President Bush said about Judge Owen (in conjunction with the republican’s majority in the Senate) is appears to be a huge loss for the democrats. In fact, Owen appears to be, for all intense purprises, on the bench.
“Judge Owen is finally going to get an up or down vote on the Senate floor. She is my friend, and more importantly, she’s a great judge. I want to thank the Texas Senators who have been so strong, standing beside Priscilla. There was never any doubt in the Senators’ minds that Priscilla Owen is well-qualified to honorably serve on the federal bench. And it’s such a — it’s a great day for our friend, to see our friend finally get a just due, after a long, long wait. So, welcome and congratulations…” – President Bush
As far as I can tell the “Constitutional Option” is still armed and use able. The democrats have just given a few inches to a few judges and nothing more.
The only thing I can say is that the “back-down” of the democrats is just a stall tactic – designed to give them more leverage once their “press” friends smear Bush’s judges. Then it will be back to the filibuster.
I may be wrong. If any of you have a concise explanation as to exactly the nature of the “agreement” I would like to hear it.